Netanyahu Gets First Crack at Forming a New Government in Israel
After a fourth inconclusive election in two years, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now has a possible path to stay in office even as he stands trial on corruption charges.,
JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel was asked by the president on Tuesday to try to form a new coalition government, offering a possible path for him to remain in office even as he stands trial on corruption charges.
It won’t be easy and success is by no means guaranteed given the abiding divisions that have led to a political impasse, which has only worsened year by year.
While the country remains split along the fault lines of secular and religious, right-wing and left-wing and Jewish and Arab, the main rupture has increasingly revolved around the polarizing figure of Mr. Netanyahu himself. He got the nod to form a new government one day after the opening of the evidentiary stage of his trial on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust.
A political survivor and Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, Mr. Netanyahu has spent the last 12 years in office. But after four inconclusive elections in two years, he and his allies have failed to win enough support to ensure a parliamentary majority that could decisively end the country’s political deadlock.
Mr. Netanyahu now has 28 days to try to assemble a coalition that could command a majority of at least 61 in the 120-seat Parliament, with the possibility of a 14-day extension. If he fails, the president, Reuven Rivlin, could task another candidate or refer the choice to Parliament.
In last month’s election, Mr. Netanyahu’s conservative Likud emerged as the largest party, with 30 seats. Together with allies in the right-wing and ultra-Orthodox camps, he has 52 seats. While short of a majority, that total nonetheless gives him a better shot than any opponents at forming a government.
Still, even Mr. Rivlin expressed doubts about Mr. Netanyahu’s chances of success, a day after the president met with representatives of all 13 parties elected to Parliament and received their recommendations for the premiership.
“The results of the consultations, which were open to all, led me to believe that no candidate has a realistic chance of forming a government that will have the confidence of Parliament,” Mr. Rivlin said in a televised address. But, he added, “The law obliges me to entrust one of the candidates with forming a government.”
There is much at stake for Mr. Netanyahu, the country and the future of its democracy. Some of his allies have pledged to use a new government to provide him with some type of immunity, whether through legislation or the appointment of a new, more sympathetic attorney general. They have also pledged to curb the powers of the Supreme Court.
Critics have warned of an impending constitutional crisis. Hours after leaving court on Monday, Mr. Netanyahu accused the prosecution of having illegally tampered with evidence, conducting a “witch hunt” against him and attempting to carry out a judicial “coup.”
Ben Caspit, a political commentator and author of a 2017 biography of the prime minister, described him in Tuesday’s Maariv newspaper as “a leader trying to dismantle the institutions of state from the inside.”
In order to form the kind of “full-on right-wing government” Mr. Netanyahu promised his voters, the prime minister would need the support of another small right-wing party that has been sitting on the fence. He would also need the far-right flank of his potential coalition to agree to rely on the support of a small Arab, Islamist party that has become a potential kingmaker.
So far, Mr. Netanyahu’s partners on the far right have rejected that proposition. The other option is for Mr. Netanyahu to woo defectors from the opposite camp.
“We will have to be creative,” said Danny Danon, a former Likud minister who served as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations. “Everything will be on the table. People will have to be flexible,” he said, “including Netanyahu.”
Mr. Netanyahu’s trial began in May and he has denied the charges against him. There is nothing in the current law to prevent a prime minister under indictment from remaining in office.
But the spectacle of a sitting prime minister appearing as a defendant in court is a painful precedent for Israel and critics have argued that a candidate under indictment should not be allowed to form a new government.
Mr. Rivlin said he was well aware of the legal and constitutional debate that has been roiling Israel.
“The question of giving the role to a candidate facing criminal charges was one of intense political and public disagreement over the recent election campaigns,” he said. But as the president, who represents all Israelis, he said he thought he should stay out of the argument.
“It is the role of the Parliament to decide on the substantive and ethical question of the fitness of a candidate facing criminal charges to serve as prime minister,” he added.
Ultimately, he said, “Israel’s democracy is nourished entirely by the will of the voter.”
On previous occasions, Mr. Rivlin has invited the candidate tasked with forming a government to his official residence to sit together for a short conversation and a photo and receive the letter of appointment. But that did not happen this time. Instead, the letter was delivered to Mr. Netanyahu. The president’s office did not provide any official reason for the change.
Beyond the 30 seats for Mr. Netanyahu’s Likud party, the remaining 90 parliamentary seats are split among a dozen parties. Yair Lapid’s centrist Yesh Atid party came in second, with 17 seats. All of the others numbered in the single digits.
“The president fulfilled his duty and he had no choice,” Mr. Lapid said shortly after Mr. Netanyahu was tasked with trying to form the government. “But giving the mandate to Netanyahu is a shameful disgrace that tarnishes Israel and casts shame on our status as a law-abiding state,” he said.
The anti-Netanyahu political bloc has so far proved too incoherent to act together to unseat Mr. Netanyahu. It is made up of parties with clashing agendas and some have ruled out sitting in a government with others.
The new Parliament, sworn in on Tuesday, is deeply splintered and includes ultraconservatives and ultranationalists who had not been voted in before. One of them, Itamar Ben Gvir, advocates the expulsion of any Arab citizen who is deemed disloyal to Israel. Another, Avi Maoz, leads a small anti-L. G.B.T. faction.
Opponents of Mr. Netanyahu, including Merav Michaeli, the leader of the Labor Party, said they planned to introduce bills aimed at barring a candidate under indictment from becoming prime minister or president, or limiting a prime minister’s terms in office, moves that could stymie the prime minister’s options should the current stalemate lead to a fifth election.