High Turnout in Contest to Decide Gavin Newsom’s Future

On Election Day, Californians are deciding whether to remove the governor from office and, if so, who should replace him.,

Current time in California: Sept. 14, 7:48 p.m.

LiveUpdated Sept. 14, 2021, 10:48 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:48 p.m. ET

America’s most populous state is weighing whether to oust its governor or let him finish his term. Californians have a long list of possible replacements to consider, too. Polls close at 8 p.m. Pacific.

ImageA voter walks into the Humboldt County Fairgrounds to cast his vote in Ferndale, Calif.
A voter walks into the Humboldt County Fairgrounds to cast his vote in Ferndale, Calif.Credit…Alexandra Hootnick for The New York Times
image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:48 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:48 p.m. ET

Jill Cowan

Reporting from Orange County

A crucial group with relatively low turnout: young voters. 28 percent of the ballots mailed for this election went to voters 18 to 34, the largest share of any age group. But those voters have returned the <https://www.politicaldata.com/2021-special-election-tracker/|fewest ballots so far.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:46 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:46 p.m. ET
Mail-in ballots being sorted at a Santa Clara County elections office in August. Credit…Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

More than nine million votes have already been received in the California recall election, suggesting a relatively high turnout more reminiscent not of a low-wattage special election but of a high-profile midterm.

These nine million votes will probably account for most of the ballots cast in the election. They were overwhelmingly cast by mail or through early in-person voting. And they offer an emerging picture of an electorate that is somewhat older, whiter and more highly educated than those who had returned ballots at this time in last November’s presidential election.

Overall in the recall, registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by a 25-point margin in ballots recorded so far, 51 to 26 percent, according to figures from Political Data, a California-based data vendor. That Democratic advantage is nearly identical to the 50 percent to 25 percent edge that California Democrats enjoyed among the ballots returned by this point in 2020.

Like last November’s election, registered Democrats have been slightly likelier to cast advance ballots than Republicans, likely reflecting the new Democratic enthusiasm for mail voting during the pandemic — or Republican skepticism of mail voting during the Trump era.

President Biden went on to win California by 29 percentage points.

Despite the similar partisan makeup of the advance vote, the state has received fewer ballots than at this point in the general election, when 13 million ballots had already been returned to election officials.

Over all, 16 percent of the returns are from 18- to 34-year-old voters and 18 percent are thought to be Latinos, based on their surnames or neighborhoods. At this point in 2020, 21 percent were ages 18 to 34 and 21 percent were Latinos.

Typically, young and Latino voters are likelier to vote closer to the election and will likely represent a larger share of all voters, as they did in 2020.

Even so, the recall turnout appears high by nearly any other standard besides the 2020 election. Already, more people have returned ballots than cast votes in the last California recall election in 2003, when the Democratic governor Gray Davis was recalled and replaced by Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican. It is also higher than the total turnout in the 2014 midterm election.

The relatively high and Democratic turnout so far has further narrowed the already daunting path to recall Mr. Newsom. The possibility that Republicans might benefit from an unusual turnout advantage was thought to be one of the likeliest ways that the recall effort might succeed in an overwhelmingly Democratic state.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:43 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:43 p.m. ET

Soumya Karlamangla

Reporting from Los Angeles

Newsom has been warning that he is what stands between California becoming Texas or Florida, and has pointed to Florida’s high Covid-19 numbers and Texas’s stringent abortion ban.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:35 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:35 p.m. ET

Shawn Hubler

Reporting from Sacramento

The recall probably couldn’t have happened without Covid-19. It gave Gov. Gavin Newsom’s opponents an extension to circulate petitions, made Californians anxious and agitated, and got Newsom in trouble with that dinner at The French Laundry.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:35 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:35 p.m. ET

Shawn Hubler

Reporting from Sacramento

But the pandemic also generated billions of dollars in federal aid, which allowed Newsom to roll out mass vaccinations. And lately, cases have plateaued, allowing the governor to run as the leader of a state with one of the nation’s highest vaccination rates.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:30 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:30 p.m. ET

Jennifer Medina

Reporting from Los Angeles

We’re 30 minutes away from polls closing. With so many mailed ballots, we could have some quick results — but California is notoriously slow, so a tight race will mean a long night.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:31 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:31 p.m. ET

Soumya Karlamangla

Reporting from Los Angeles

The early returns are likely to show a wide lead for Newsom, with the ballots returned so far mostly from registered Democrats. But if the race appears tight early on, it’s possible there are Democrats voting for the recall that polling has missed.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:26 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:26 p.m. ET
Eleni Kounalakis, California’s lieutenant governor, was responsible for setting the date of the recall election.Credit…Steve Yeater/Associated Press

At first, political experts said that if it happened, the recall election would happen later in the year — probably November? There was a complex, lengthy process that would have to take place first, and the earlier estimates accounted for all of that. But the date came much sooner than expected: Sept. 14.

How? Why? What does it mean for Newsom and his opponents? Here’s what you need to know.

Who set the election date for Sept. 14?

The date was decided by Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, a Democrat who is closely allied with the governor. It was the soonest that county officials said they could pull together a special election.

Previous estimates were later because the recall election process required an additional step, a cost review, before a date could be set. But lawmakers passed a bill in June allowing the state to bypass that review and pick an earlier date.

Is the date good or bad for Newsom?

It’s clear that Newsom and his advisers believe the earlier date is good for him. From a lawmaking standpoint, the Sept. 14 timing is advantageous for the governor, according to David McCuan, a political science professor at Sonoma State University.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:23 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:23 p.m. ET

Conor Dougherty

Reporting from Oakland

California’s recall provision was part of a suite of voting reforms passed by progressive Republicans in 1911 to curb the power of the railroads. But now these reforms have become tools of big business.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:19 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:19 p.m. ET

Jennifer Medina

Reporting from Los Angeles

Baseless accusations of voter fraud from Republican leaders have taken hold among some G.O.P. voters — several I spoke with in Orange County today said they were unsure whether they would believe the result.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:09 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:09 p.m. ET

Soumya Karlamangla

Reporting from Los Angeles

The common wisdom is that elections favor the incumbent, but not with recalls. The recall elections that took place across the U.S. between 2010 and 2020 had a removal rate of about 60 percent. In California, the removal rate was far higher — 78 percent.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 10:00 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 10:00 p.m. ET

Conor Dougherty

Reporting from Oakland

A hidden advantage for Gov. Gavin Newsom: He’s from San Francisco. Bay Area voters have very high turnout, perhaps why its politicians — Newsom, Kamala Harris, Dianne Feinstein — have long dominated state politics.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 9:49 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 9:49 p.m. ET

Jeremy W. Peters

Reporting from Orange County

As poll closing gets closer, long lines have formed at election sites in Costa Mesa and Huntington Beach in Orange County, a traditional G.O.P. redoubt that has swung back and forth in recent elections.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 9:51 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 9:51 p.m. ET

Jennifer Medina

Reporting from Los Angeles

Republicans really need to see a massive in-person turnout in order to close the gap with Democrats, which stood at more than 2 million votes earlier today. Not all Democrats necessarily voted against the recall, but those numbers are a big part of what’s leading to early exuberance among Gov. Gavin Newsom’s supporters.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 9:36 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 9:36 p.m. ET
Californians cast their votes at the Museum of Latin American Art in Long Beach, Calif., on Tuesday.Credit…Ryan Young for The New York Times

As of Election Day, polls show a significant edge for Gov. Gavin Newsom, with 57 percent of Californians against the recall and 41.5 percent in support, according to the FiveThirtyEight average.

There are, of course, no guarantees, and election results will not be released for several hours. But experts say that Mr. Newsom’s advantage appears large enough to withstand major polling errors.

Mr. Newsom’s bump in the polls may come as a surprise, given how close the race appeared weeks ago.

In July, a poll by The Los Angeles Times and the University of California, Berkeley, found a near 50-50 split on the recall among likely voters. When that same group released new data on Friday, 60 percent of likely voters opposed recalling Mr. Newsom, more than 21 percentage points higher than the share that wanted to oust him.

There are several possible explanations for the shift, experts say.

Between the pandemic and wildfires, the election hadn’t been on the average Californian’s radar until ballots appeared in mailboxes in mid-August. As with the presidential election last year, all 22-plus million registered voters in the state received a ballot to vote by mail.

“The minute the absentee ballots went out, suddenly everybody’s ears perked up,” said Raphael Sonenshein, the executive director of the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs at California State University, Los Angeles.

More people paying attention to the election helped Mr. Newsom because of how heavily Democratic California is — registered Democrats outnumber Republicans nearly two to one. In other words, if enough people vote, Mr. Newsom’s job is safe.

Plus, the polls from earlier in the summer that showed a tighter race may have helped motivate Democrats. Many liberals may have initially assumed that the election was a long shot and that they could skip voting.

In recent weeks, Mr. Newsom, aided by $70 million in campaign contributions, has also been hammering home the idea that he is all that stands between Californians and a future defined by a president most of them didn’t want. “We may have defeated Donald Trump, but we have not defeated Trumpism,” Mr. Newsom said.

His argument may have been bolstered by the emergence of a top rival, the conservative talk radio host Larry Elder, who once called the election of Mr. Trump “divine intervention.”

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 9:26 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 9:26 p.m. ET

Jill Cowan

Reporting from Orange County

There’s been a lot of discussion about Gov. Gavin Newsom’s ill-fated dinner at The French Laundry during the pandemic (our restaurant critic explains why it was such a big deal), but it’s still been kind of amazing that nearly every voter I’ve talked to, both for and against the recall, has mentioned that dinner as informing their opinion of him.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 9:15 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 9:15 p.m. ET

FULLERTON, Calif. — The quiet unnerved Steven Vaughn, 55, who showed up at the Fullerton Library to cast his ballot to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from office. As Mr. Vaughn saw it, Mr. Newsom is an elitist who has been out of touch with voters from the moment he stepped into office. And everyone he knows, Mr. Vaughn said, feels the same way. But when he arrived at the polling place midday, there were hardly any other voters around.

This worried Mr. Vaughn, since he knew supporters of the recall were relying on robust in-person turnout, having stoked fears about voting by mail for weeks. “Maybe it means we’re going to lose,” he said, adding that he could not be certain he would believe the results if Mr. Newsom won.

Supporters of the recall, including former President Donald J. Trump and the leading Republican candidate, Larry Elder, have sown doubts about the election results in recent days. Mr. Elder went as far as announcing on Monday, before a single vote had been counted, that his team had created a website for supporters to report claims of fraud.

It is impossible to know whether conspiracy theories of a “rigged” election have suppressed Republican turnout, but Mr. Vaughn said he was not worried about that. “We’ll make our voices heard,” he said. “We’re the not-silent majority.”

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:59 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:59 p.m. ET

Conor Dougherty

Reporting from Oakland

Can we talk about zoning? Still on Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk is a controversial bill that would allow duplexes in single-family neighborhoods across California, in hopes of easing the state’s housing shortage. Newsom’s office won’t comment on whether he intends to sign it, presumably because the normally dry topic of zoning has become a hot-button issue as California’s housing crisis has deepened.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:58 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:58 p.m. ET
Poll workers and voters at a voting site in El Centro, Calif., on Tuesday.Credit…John Francis Peters for The New York Times

There is no evidence of any fraud in the California recall election so far, but that hasn’t stopped a large number of partisan election observers from hunting for nefarious actors.

Across California, partisan poll watchers have been monitoring ballot boxes, early-voting locations and Election Day polling sites. Some have been aggressive toward voters, while others have repeatedly challenged voter signatures, according to election officials. And some have even tried to obtain personal information about election administrators.

“Our office is seeing more aggressive behavior by observers,” said Mike Sanchez, a spokesman for the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder, the county’s elections office. “Election-related activities are open and transparent, and we welcome members of the public to observe the process. But observers cannot disrupt the election process, or interact/interview our employees.”

Multiple groups that call themselves election integrity outfits have been focusing on the recall election, including one from Larry Elder, the leading Republican candidate. The California Republican Party has also revamped its election integrity operation for the recall. The expansion of such groups comes as false allegations of election fraud in California have become widespread among conservatives both in the state and nationally.

Mr. Elder has suggested, without any evidence, that there might be “shenanigans” in the administration of the election and that there are fraudulent mail ballots. Former President Donald J. Trump has repeatedly made the false claim that the election is rigged. That narrative quickly spilled into the voting process on Tuesday.

“Our inbound calls that we receive in our phone bank have very similar and consistent themes,” said Neal Kelley, the top elections official for Orange County. “It’s almost like people are kind of reading things on the internet and then they’re just kind of repeating that to us. And we’re seeing the same things from the observers as well.”

One group, known as the Election Integrity Project, has been particularly prevalent across the state, with observers continually making challenges or disrupting the process, as reported by The Los Angeles Times. Mr. Sanchez confirmed that the Los Angeles County elections office had received complaints of aggressive behavior by members of the Election Integrity Project.

Formed roughly nine years ago, the Election Integrity Project claims to be a nonpartisan nonprofit group. The organization says it seeks “to fulfill our duty to actively participate in the governing of our state/country by helping to defend the integrity of the voting process that protects our freedoms and way of life,” according to its website.

Despite its claims of nonpartisanship, the project has teamed up with conservative groups such as Judicial Watch and has espoused conspiracy theories about American elections, especially about mail ballots. The group claims to have trained more than 10,000 observers since its formation, though election officials across the state estimate that only a small percentage of those observers have actually shown up at the polls.

The group is well known to Shirley Weber, a Democrat who is California’s secretary of state. She said the group had been challenging signatures at registrar’s offices, which was causing confusion because it did not have the authority or right to make such challenges.

“That’s been an issue that we’ve had to kind of restrict folks to make sure that they understood what their role was as observers, and not as persons who work here in the secretary of state’s office,” Dr. Weber said in an interview.

The Election Integrity Project did not respond to a request for comment. Dr. Weber noted that the group claims to be gathering information for a possible legal action or challenges after the election.

“We know that they’re collecting material,” Dr. Weber said. “Whatever that is, we have yet to see it, because I understand all of that is being collected for a lawsuit, and not necessarily just to be given to us as, ‘Here’s some things we think will help you do a better job.’ So it’s not like they’re the helpful hands that we get. No, they’re not.”

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:56 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:56 p.m. ET

Lisa Lerer

The recall shows how inescapable Donald Trump remains in American politics. Gov. Gavin Newsom actively tried to rally Democrats by warning about Trumpism. And Republicans hewed closely to Trump’s top issue, raising baseless alarms about a rigged election and voter fraud.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:40 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:40 p.m. ET

By The New York Times

Open image modal at item 1 of 5image
Open image modal at item 2 of 5image
Open image modal at item 3 of 5image
Open image modal at item 4 of 5image
Open image modal at item 5 of 5image

Californians across the state went to the polls in Tuesday’s recall election. Locations across the state will remain open for voters until 8 p.m. local time.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:24 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:24 p.m. ET

Shawn Hubler

Reporting from Sacramento

Polls haven’t even closed and 43 percent of California’s huge electorate has already voted. A big reason is — wait for it — the pandemic, which led to all of the state’s 22 million or so active and registered voters being mailed ballots. A bill to make the system permanent is now on the governor’s desk.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:23 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:23 p.m. ET

PALO ALTO, Calif. — At Palo Alto’s Cubberley Community Center, so many people came to vote in person on Election Day that the volunteers working the center had to add four additional poll workers.

“We’ve been working our butts off,” said Peggy Keep, a poll worker, sinking into a red-and-gray lawn chair to eat her first meal of the day at 3:30 p.m.

One of the over 550 voters who showed up was Chris Mo, a recent graduate of nearby Henry M. Gunn High School. He turned 18 nine days after the presidential election last fall, and cast his first ever vote on Tuesday to keep Gov. Gavin Newsom in office. “I don’t want the possibility of a Republican governor,” he said.

Many voters at the community center, a short bike ride from the tech campuses of downtown Palo Alto, agreed with him. Just over half of voters in Santa Clara County, which includes Palo Alto, are registered Democrats, compared to 16 percent who are Republicans.

Tanner Kenneth, a recent transplant from the Midwest completing his graduate degree at Stanford, voted for the recall, saying that he was in favor of a divided government. “The Covid stuff was a little severe,” he added.

Palo Alto, along with the rest of the Bay Area, was first in the nation to institute a lockdown last March. Over 80 percent of Santa Clara County residents are now vaccinated.

Across Highway 101, in East Palo Alto, over 100 voters had showed up to cast their ballots in the Lewis and Joan Platt Family YMCA by midafternoon. The city is made up overwhelmingly of people of color, and its vaccination rate, at 82.3 percent, surpasses much of California but lags behind nearby, wealthier areas like Menlo Park, where San Mateo County reports that 100 percent of individuals over the age of 10 are vaccinated.

At the YMCA on Tuesday, many expressed only qualified support for Gov. Gavin Newsom: “With a lot of these politicians, if these were regular jobs, they’d be fired,” said David Moore, 57. Mr. Moore said he wanted to see more action on “better roads, jobs, infrastructure.” Still, he and others at the polling place indicated that they were voting for Mr. Newsom to keep his job.

Icaro Vazquez, 51, a product manager at the software start-up Chronosphere and an East Palo Alto resident, said the governor was “doing mostly OK,” despite his infamous French Laundry faux pas. “On the optics, he screwed up, but on the rest, he was fine,” Mr. Vazquez said.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:10 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:10 p.m. ET

Jennifer Medina

Reporting from Los Angeles

For weeks Republicans have baselessly stoked fears of voter fraud, urging their voters to show up in person rather than vote by mail. That means we’re likely to see an early lead for Gov. Gavin Newsom after polls close that will probably dwindle as more in-person ballots are counted.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:02 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:02 p.m. ET

Jennifer Medina

Reporting from Los Angeles

Because Democrats far outnumber Republicans in California, and because Democrats were more likely to vote by mail, supporters of the recall are hoping for a robust in-person turnout at the polls today.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 8:09 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 8:09 p.m. ET

Jill Cowan

Reporting from Orange County

The governor’s campaign staff members, however, are hoping to see high in-person turnout among Latino voters, who lean Democratic and have returned relatively few ballots so far.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:54 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:54 p.m. ET
Campaign signs for Larry Elder outside of the Huntington Beach Central Library in Orange County on Tuesday.Credit…Allison Zaucha for The New York Times

HUNTINGTON BEACH, Calif. — There are only a handful of congressional districts in the country where Republicans unseated Democrats last year.

Orange County has two of them. And if the recall vote to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom succeeds here — or comes close — even if it fails statewide, that would be a serious indication that the long-anticipated flip from red to blue here is failing to materialize.

“I don’t know about the rest of the state,” said Fred Whitaker, chairman of the Orange County Republican Party, “but Orange County is going to vote to recall this governor.”

This traditionally Republican redoubt has trended away from the Republican Party in recent years. Before Hillary Clinton won it in 2016, no Democrat had carried the county since Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936.

Though President Biden won it last year with 53 percent of the vote, Orange County voters helped defeat two Democratic incumbents who were swept into office just two years earlier, as a backlash to Donald J. Trump led to a repudiation of Republican candidates nationwide. Michelle Steel defeated Harley Rouda in the district that runs up the coast, while Young Kim defeated Gil Cisneros in a district farther inland, north of Anaheim. The two are among only nine Republican members of Congress elected in districts that Mr. Biden won.

Mr. Whitaker, who said he dropped off his ballot over the weekend at his neighborhood drop box, pointed to anecdotal reports of long lines at local polling places, which he interpreted as a good sign considering that many Republicans are partial to voting in person. And the staff answering the phones at the Orange County G.O.P. headquarters reported receiving information from poll watchers about crowds at sites across the county.

Though many Republicans are concerned that their party’s front-runner, the talk show host Larry Elder, is too polarizing to win over enough voters, Mr. Whitaker said he wasn’t so sure that was true in Orange County. He said Mr. Elder’s appeal was that he isn’t the kind of candidate that a more traditional Republican — someone white and middle-aged, like Mr. Whitaker — would naturally gravitate toward.

“He gets good traction with somebody who hasn’t been voting for a while than he does with somebody like me,” Mr. Whitaker said. “I don’t think your run-of-the-mill Republican gets through the messaging noise. But Larry gets through.”

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:51 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:51 p.m. ET

Jill Cowan

Reporting from Orange County

Talking to voters over the past month, I’ve been struck by the fact that very few people expressed strong support for Gov. Gavin Newsom personally. No one mentioned voting for him in 2018, or talked about really loving him as mayor of San Francisco. But they seemed to have gotten his message that they were voting against Trump.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:39 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:39 p.m. ET

Maggie Astor

The recall may be almost over, but the fund-raising off it isn’t. I just got an email from the campaign of a Democratic member of Congress, claiming that a “breaking poll” shows the race nearly tied and asking people to “donate right now to save Newsom before polls close” in three and a half hours. (No recent poll shows the race nearly tied.)

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:34 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:34 p.m. ET
Voters turned in their ballots outside the Alameda County Courthouse in Oakland, Calif., on Monday.Credit…Jim Wilson/The New York Times

Californians have been voting early for weeks in the election to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom. But it is unclear how long it will take to get a definitive answer on whether he will keep his job.

Depending on the number of early ballots and the amount of in-person voting on Tuesday, the math could be clear within a few hours of when the polls close at 8 p.m. Pacific time, election experts say. But if the race is tighter than expected, weeks could pass while the counting drags on.

Recall attempts are a fact of political life for governors of California. But they do not usually make it onto the ballot, and Californians have gone to the polls only one other time to determine whether the state’s top officeholder should be ousted. That was in 2003, when Gov. Gray Davis was recalled and replaced by Arnold Schwarzenegger. Since then, the state’s voting rules and electorate have changed substantially.

Because of the safety concerns arising from the coronavirus pandemic, ballots were mailed early to all of the state’s 22 million or so registered and active voters in the 2020 election. Voters can return their completed ballots by mail, deposit them in secure drop boxes, vote early in person or vote at a polling place on Tuesday.

Nearly 40 percent of registered voters have already cast ballots, but many Republicans have indicated that they plan to vote in person, citing — without evidence — a concern that election officials in the Democrat-dominated state will tamper with their ballots. Studies after the 2020 election found that the system had worked smoothly, with no systemic voter fraud.

Early Democratic ballots have outnumbered Republican ones by two to one, with overwhelming majorities of voters in both parties telling pollsters they plan to vote along party lines. Mr. Newsom is a Democrat, as is about 46 percent of the electorate.

But that margin is expected to tighten as Republican voters — who represent fewer than a quarter of registered voters — head to the polls.

Vote counts are notoriously slow in California because the state is so massive. The law for this election allows county officials to open and process early ballots as they come in, but those results cannot be shared with the public until the polls close, said Jenna Dresner, a spokeswoman for the California secretary of state’s office.

California has 58 counties, and each processes its ballots differently. Results often land later in larger counties, such as Los Angeles County. Officials have 30 days to complete their official canvass and must give vote-by-mail ballots postmarked on Election Day a week to arrive. The certified count is not expected until Oct. 22.

Significant partial counts should be available within a couple of hours after polls close in some key areas, such as the Bay Area and Orange County. And the electoral math in California should offer some strong clues about the outcome, said Paul Mitchell, a vice president of Political Data Inc., a nonpartisan supplier of election data.

Because so many voters are Democrats, he said, the higher the turnout, the better Mr. Newsom’s chances are of beating the recall. If the overall turnout hits 60 percent, he said, the proposed ouster of Mr. Newsom is almost mathematically impossible.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:34 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:34 p.m. ET

ARCADIA, Calif. — From her desk in this Los Angeles suburb, Fenglan Liu, 53, responded to a steady stream of questions about the California recall coming from voters on the Chinese messaging app WeChat.

A message popped up from a person requesting a ride to a voting center: Ms. Liu called a volunteer to arrange that. Then another.

“It’s very, very busy,” she said. “Chinese community is waking up and getting involved in politics.”

Ms. Liu is the face of an increasingly politically active constituency of Chinese Americans in Southern California.

In interviews, several said that marijuana dispensaries, homeless people and crime are ruining the cluster of cities east of Los Angeles where Chinese immigrants, many of them now American citizens, have thrived for years. And they place the blame squarely on Gavin Newsom.

Ms. Liu, who immigrated to the United States from mainland China 21 years ago, has been instrumental to mobilizing Chinese American voters in the San Gabriel Valley to support the recall. Starting in June last year, she enlisted an army of volunteers in Arcadia, El Monte and Temple City to collect 10,000 signatures.

“We really don’t like the situation in California,” Ms. Liu said. “No place is safe; crime is terrible. Newsom needs to go. This is failed management, not the pandemic.”

Asian Americans are the fastest-growing ethnic group in California, and their influence in politics has swelled as their numbers have increased.

When the last governor faced a recall, in 2003, Asian Americans comprised seven percent of the electorate. Today they account for 17 percent of all voters in the state.

The majority of Asian Americans in California lean Democratic, according to polls. But Republicans flipped two congressional districts in 2020 electing the first two Korean American congresswomen with support from Asian American voters.

As the recall approached, both Mr. Newsom and his top rival, Larry Elder, courted Asian Americans.

Ms. Liu helped organize successful campaigns in recent years to block plans to build a medical cannabis processing plant and to convert a motel into affordable housing for veterans and formerly homeless people in the San Gabriel Valley.

On Tuesday, Ms. Liu was pleased to encounter a steady influx of Chinese Americans at a voting center in Temple City, and volunteers escorting older Chinese Americans to vote.

“It’s so nice to see people here,” she said. “Before, this many Chinese did not vote.”

Several Chinese Americans who emerged from the voting station echoed Ms. Liu’s concerns about safety as motivating them to want to recall the governor. Others, like Jessie Chiu, 63, derided Mr. Newsom’s “liberal policies,” citing L.G.B.T.Q. issues, marijuana and abortion.

But not every Chinese American wanted to remove the governor, especially young adults like Ryan Lee.

“I voted against the recall,” said the 21-year-old college student, who was born in California to Taiwanese immigrants.

“I’d rather stick with Gavin Newsom than some unknown entity. Maybe he’s not the best. But he’s not a bad governor, either,” he said.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:24 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:24 p.m. ET

Jennifer Medina

Reporting from Los Angeles

The recall largely papered over some of California’s most persistent and pervasive problems, such as inequality, housing and homelessness. Instead, the campaigns became largely about the pandemic and the national political zeitgeist. But the problems, of course, will still be here no matter what happens tonight.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:14 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:14 p.m. ET

By Sona Patel

Larry Elder campaigning in Monterey Park on Monday.Credit…Alex Welsh for The New York Times

Besides this effort to recall Gov. Newsom, only one other attempted recall of a California governor, Gray Davis, has ever reached an election. And California is the only place where a recall of a governor has made the ballot twice. So how does the process work?

A recall petition must be signed by enough registered voters to equal 12 percent of the turnout in the last election for governor. The organizers do not need to give a reason for the recall, but they often do. The petition must include at least 1 percent of the last vote for the office in at least five counties. Proponents have 160 days to gather their signatures.

The signatures must then be examined and verified by the California secretary of state. If the petitions meet the threshold — 1,495,709 valid signatures in this case — voters who signed have 30 business days to change their minds.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:11 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:11 p.m. ET

Lisa Lerer

National Democrats will be watching the results of this race closely for clues about what voters are thinking. One area of particular interest: The pandemic. Gov. Gavin Newsom leaned into a message of mask wearing and vaccine mandates. A big victory for him would reinforce that message for Democrats thinking ahead to the midterms.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:34 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:34 p.m. ET

Jeremy W. Peters

Reporting from Orange County

If national Democrats are looking for clues from California about mask/vaccine mandates and 2022, that will be music to the ears of Republicans, who are already well positioned to win the House back in 2022.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:06 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:06 p.m. ET

Jeremy W. Peters

Reporting from Orange County

Of all the issues central to the recall — lockdowns, income inequality, crime, homelessness — one huge story has been less prominent: During the coronavirus pandemic, California paid out more than $11 billion in fraudulent unemployment claims.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:07 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:07 p.m. ET

Conor Dougherty

Reporting from Oakland

Over the final week of the recall campaign, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office has highlighted how much rental assistance the state has paid out as part of the American Rescue Plan. The program was originally hobbled by bureaucracy, making it difficult for landlords and tenants to access. I have to wonder if some of those original problems stemmed from the unemployment debacle.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 7:04 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 7:04 p.m. ET

IRVINE, Calif. — Irvine Civic Center was bustling shortly before noon on Tuesday. The parking lot was full and cars circled looking for spots.

A long line of voters preparing to cast their ballots in person stretched through the airy lobby of Irvine’s City Hall and out around the edge of the sun-baked civic center plaza in the Orange County suburb.

Marc Martino, 26, dressed in blue scrubs, dropped off his ballot. He said he tries not to talk politics with his parents. “They’re the opposite of me, politically,” he added.

So Mr. Martino had not discussed with them his vote against the recall. “As a health care worker, it was important to me to have a governor who follows science,” he said.

Ganesh Krishnan, 34, and Felix Williams, 36, two friends who dropped off their ballots together, also voted against the recall.

Both said they thought the ability to remove an elected official was important, but the threshold for forcing an election was too low.

“I think the ability is good, but I think the process is too easy,” Mr. Krishnan said.

Both men also dismissed concerns about voting by mail.

Mr. Williams said that disbelief in the election system was troubling: “Just because you don’t believe CNN doesn’t mean YouTube is right.”

Jim Mastrosimone, 52, saw things differently.

Mr. Mastrosimone waited 45 minutes in line with his wife and daughter so they could cast ballots in person. He repeated unsubstantiated claims about voters casting multiple ballots, and he was eager to see Mr. Newsom removed.

He said the state under the governor was headed in the wrong direction, and that taxes and gas prices were too high. He said small businesses suffered while big businesses amassed more wealth.

Mr. Mastrosimone was vaccinated, but he said that he doesn’t believe people should be required to get their shots. Larry Elder, the Republican front-runner, eventually won his support.

Mr. Mastrosimone said he believed the list of replacement candidates was too long, which made it difficult to figure out who to vote for.

But ultimately, he valued the recall system. “It gives the power to the little guy,” he said.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 6:40 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 6:40 p.m. ET

Maggie Astor

This campaign has laid bare the limitations of California’s recall system, which allows an official to be recalled and then replaced by someone who received far fewer votes. Democratic leaders are already Talking about changes — not eliminating recalls, but modifying the process.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 6:40 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 6:40 p.m. ET

Maggie Astor

For example, critics have suggested requiring more signatures to get a recall on the ballot, having the lieutenant governor replace a recalled governor, or holding a direct contest between the incumbent and his or her challengers rather than separating the recall into two questions.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 6:35 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 6:35 p.m. ET
Mike Murphy, who has served as a strategist for politicians like John McCain and Arnold Schwarzenegger, on NBC’s “Meet the Press” in 2007.Credit…Alex Wong/Getty Images for Meet the Press

The last time Californians recalled their governor, in 2003, Mike Murphy was one of the strategists who helped make it happen, bringing a cinematic sense of spectacle to the race that suited both the state and his candidate, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

But politically, California was a much different place. “This is a state where a box of hammers with a ‘D’ stamped on it can win,” said Mr. Murphy, who lives in Los Angeles and has worked mostly for the kinds of Republicans who have fallen out of favor with the party’s voters — Jeb Bush, John McCain, former President George H.W. Bush. “That’s where we are.”

Mr. Murphy helped Mr. Schwarzenegger channel voter discontent in 2003, when Californians were unnerved by rolling blackouts and an increase in vehicle registration fees, in contrast to today’s angst over raging wildfires and the government’s coronavirus response.

Mr. Murphy choreographed the Schwarzenegger campaign’s signature stunt that year: dropping a wrecking ball on an old Buick spray-painted with the words “Davis Car Tax.” It was meant as a visual reminder of Mr. Schwarzenegger’s pledge to get rid of the vehicle fee increase put in place by the man he would eventually displace from office, Gov. Gray Davis, a Democrat.

“I wanted to blow it up,” Mr. Murphy said in an interview. And even though Mr. Schwarzenegger loved the idea — “Do it! Do it!” Mr. Murphy recalled him saying — they ultimately decided against it, given that the plan was to pull the stunt off at a campaign rally where Schwarzenegger fans could potentially be injured.

Mr. Murphy said that this year, he doubted there was anything Republicans could do — pyrotechnic or otherwise — to lift Larry Elder, the talk radio host and G.O.P. front-runner, over Gov. Gavin Newsom.

“If this were Michigan or another swing state, he’d be in much more trouble,” Mr. Murphy said of the governor. “But he didn’t even get the workout he deserved.

“Trump has just put anthrax in the water here, so it was impossible to clear the field for a viable Republican. That’s the world we’re in with Trump’s Republican Party.”

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 6:20 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 6:20 p.m. ET

Jennifer Medina

Reporting from Los Angeles

In the closing days of the race, Democrats framed the recall not as a referendum on Gov. Gavin Newsom, but a referendum on Trumpism. Newsom went as far as portraying the choice as a “matter of life and death.”

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 6:25 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 6:25 p.m. ET

Conor Dougherty

Reporting from Oakland

I keep wondering what the race would have been like if Kevin Faulconer — the former Republican mayor of San Diego who has played up his work with the city’s Democratic City Council — had been the front-runner to replace Newsom instead of Larry Elder, the conservative radio host. It would have blunted Newsom’s strategy of making the election all about Trump, and possibly forced the campaigns to talk about issues like wildfires or homelessness.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 6:14 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 6:14 p.m. ET
Larry Elder campaigning at Monterey Park City Hall on Monday.Credit…Alex Welsh for The New York Times

LOS ANGELES — Campaigning together on Monday, President Biden and Gov. Gavin Newsom celebrated California, the country’s most diverse state, as a potent example of multiracial democracy in action.

On the other side of the aisle, issues of race and diversity are similarly at the core of the message being put before voters by Larry Elder, the Republican radio host who is the leading contender to replace Mr. Newsom.

His message is that the United States long ago vanquished racism.

Mr. Elder’s choice of a campaign stop on Monday in Monterey Park, a city in eastern Los Angeles County that is predominantly Asian American and has a sizable Latino population, seemed intended to celebrate diversity. But Mr. Elder, who is Black, also used the visit to argue that systemic racism, which he has called a “lie,” does not exist in America anymore.

“No matter what language we speak, what color we share, even what political stripe we brag about,” Betty Chu, the former mayor of Monterey Park, told Mr. Elder’s supporters, “If it’s an ‘R,’ a ‘D,’ or ‘decline to state,’ the city long stood for anti-hate and bringing people together.”

Ms. Chu said that Mr. Elder’s success as a columnist and radio host, and the fact that he attended public schools and rose to prominence from South Central Los Angeles, were proof “that skin color doesn’t hold you back.”

For many of Mr. Elder’s supporters, especially conservative white voters who say they are tired of hearing about systemic racism after last year’s social unrest following the murder of George Floyd, that message is resonant.

Stacy Hallum, 47, a supporter of Mr. Elder’s who attended his rally on Monday, said she loved the diversity of where she lives, but said that “just because we’re white, we matter too.”

She continued: “I’m so tired of the racism thing. We’re done with racism. I’m not privileged, let me tell you.”

Mr. Elder has often sought to seize on issues of race, describing his policies as ones that will benefit people of color.

On the issue of private versus public education, he has attacked Democrats like Mr. Newsom for sending their children to private school while opposing charter schools and other forms of private or semiprivate education. Mr. Elder said such moves leave public schools to fail their Black and brown students.

“So what they’re afraid of is Larry Elder, from the hood, who attended a public school, is going to break that stranglehold Democrats have over Black and brown parents, specifically over the issue of school choice,” he said at the rally on Monday.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 5:46 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 5:46 p.m. ET

Jill Cowan

Reporting from Orange County

Even with the high vote-by-mail and early turnout, polling places in the southern parts of Orange County — very Republican — were busy. If you had dropped me at the Mission Viejo civic center with no context, I would have guessed this was a regular election day, not a special election in September.

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 5:41 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 5:41 p.m. ET

Jeremy W. Peters

Reporting from Orange County

In 2003, Republican strategist Mike Murphy helped Arnold Schwarzenegger oust a Democratic governor. How does he think the electorate has changed since then? “This is a state where a box of hammers with a ‘D’ stamped on it can win,” he told me. “That’s where we are.”

image

Sept. 14, 2021, 5:36 p.m. ETSept. 14, 2021, 5:36 p.m. ET
Video

transcript

bars

0:00/1:45

-0:00

transcript

California Residents Head to the Polls in Recall Election

Voters across California cast their ballots in a recall election to decide the political fate of Gov. Gavin Newsom. The Democrat’s main challenge is from the Republican candidate Larry Elder.

“Well, it’s always important to vote no matter what to exercise your rights. But today is particularly important because I’m not sure that everybody understands the consequences for not voting. You know, if we recall Governor Newsom, who knows who we end up with.” “Personally, I think that we need change in California. You know, I’ve been born and raised here, and the state has been in decline for the last five or so years.” “The option, unfortunately, is a very extremist conservative, and I don’t believe in the values that he imposes on women. I don’t believe in the values that he has to impose his beliefs on the American people.” “Larry Elder seems to have all the issues — what’s going on, what needs to be addressed. And I wish him the best today, I pray he gets in, and like I said, I’m a Democrat and — I — Gavin needs to go.” “I just think there is no reason for the recall. I think the job he’s doing is the best job that he could do.”

Video player loading
Voters across California cast their ballots in a recall election to decide the political fate of Gov. Gavin Newsom. The Democrat’s main challenge is from the Republican candidate Larry Elder.CreditCredit…Ryan Young for The New York Times

With false allegations of voter fraud trailing the California recall election, we checked in with Secretary of State Shirley Weber, who oversees the state’s elections, about how voting has progressed and how her office is dealing with efforts to undermine faith in the contest. The interview has been lightly edited and condensed.

How is voting going?

We’ve seen over eight million ballots mailed back thus far, which is a very significant number of ballots coming in. So that in itself is rather exciting, as well as ballots still being dropped off at the ballot boxes this morning.

We’ve had folks calling all of our hotlines asking where their polling places are or looking for additional information. It’s clear that people are interested in voting today.

Why have people been calling the hotlines?

Sometimes people have familiar polling places that they used to go to forever and now they’ve changed. We’ve had a couple of calls saying, “Where is it now?”

Secretary of State Shirley Weber in Sacramento last year. Dr. Weber oversees California’s elections.Credit…Rich Pedroncelli/Associated Press

We’ve had folks who couldn’t find their ballots — misplaced them after they came in the mail. And we’ve had folks who left the state for a bit and wonder how can they still vote, those kinds of things.

But we’ve had no long lines, no folks waiting. We have a wait time of zero right now.

Any other hitches today?

We’ve seen small things. One polling place opening 10 minutes late, that kind of stuff.

Because of the fires, we’ve had some folks who moved away from their places. So we have to deal with that issue. We had one county the telephones were not servicing. We’ve just adapted and adjusted to every little new thing that comes along. But we haven’t had anything that’s been a major shutdown.

For those facing difficulties because of the wildfires, what else have you done?

We have made sure that all of those who were in the fire zones got their mail-in ballots.

We made sure that those who had to leave or who’ve lost their homes, that they had access to voting in various other ways, in terms of being able to go to another county to vote, making sure they had their mail-in ballots, making sure they knew where the ballot boxes were in other counties or other areas. So we have made outreach to all of those who might have been affected by any fire or any kind of tragedy.

We also set up remote mobile voting for our firefighters to make sure that those who are away from their homes had access to vote.

How are you preparing your office for the claims and possible litigation of election fraud that Republicans say they may bring?

I think the whole discussion of fraud across the nation kind of gives us a preview of what people will do. They may file various lawsuits. We know that they have been trying to collect information — they set up a website saying, ‘If you see any irregularities, show us your irregularities.’ And, you know, people go to court, and thus far across the nation, they’ve lost because there is no widespread fraud in the election process. But whether they decide to go to court or not, we will be there to defend the process.

We know that they will always talk about the fact that it was a stolen election or fraud, — or there’s a new term, “shenanigans.” We have no evidence of that, and when we’ve had allegations of any type, especially if there’s any specific information, we investigated. And as most folks have found across the nation, there is no there there.

So we’re not totally freaking out. We’re just making sure that everything we do is correct by the book. That we’ve taken our time to make sure that there’s transparency. And thus far, we’ve not found anything ourselves.

Are there extra steps of transparency that you’ve taken in this hyperpartisan era when the process itself is contested?

We do what we’ve always done. This is a unique election as a recall. But keep in mind, we’ve had four or five elections this year, special elections, as well as last November.

Anytime we discover something that might be an area of concern, we do our best to make sure that we shore that up. If we discover that somebody is complaining that the signs are too small, they couldn’t really see a sign at a voting booth, we try to make sure that next time, we do more. If folks feel disenfranchised because of language, if there’s enough folks in that community, we make sure that we increase the number of languages and make sure that those languages are clear.

And so it’s not like we are gearing up because Mr. Elder says something or someone else says something. We are aware that the question of fraud or questions of transparency are constant. And, as I travel to different registrars’ offices, I see them responding to different issues, like making sure that there’s space that people can observe the opening of ballots.

When I was in one area, they had basically created pathways for folks to be able to do that. So those are the kinds of things that we respond to all the time to make sure that those who want to build issues of transparency and fairness have an opportunity to do so.

Leave a Reply